Showing posts with label #NRA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #NRA. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

NRA sues San Francisco after city labels it a terrorist organization

1568096439822.jpg

The National Rifle Association filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Monday against San Francisco after the city passed a resolution declaring the gun rights group a “domestic terrorist organization.”

Details: The NRA alleges the move violates its freedom of speech for political reasons and attempts to “blacklist anyone linked to the NRA.” NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre said in a statement that “we will never stop fighting for our law-abiding members and their constitutional freedoms.”


The big picture: The San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed the resolution last week. City supervisor Catherine Stefani told AP she drafted the resolution in response to the July 28 shooting at the Gilroy Garlic Festival, which killed 3 people and wounded 15 others.

  • Since the California mass shooting, there have been at least 3 others in the U.S. — in El Paso, Dayton and the West Texas sister cities of Odessa and Midland.

What they’re saying: Stefani told AP the lawsuit was a “desperate move” by the NRA as it’s embroiled in infighting and LaPierre has had his handling of NRA finances brought into question.

“They continue to stand in the way of gun violence reform and people are dying because of it. … I truly believe their time is up.”
San Francisco supervisor Catherine Stefani to AP

Source: https://www.axios.com/nra-sues-san-francisco-over-terrorist-declaration-5afba48a-4a39-408c-a301-9e42810f427c.html
Droolin’ Dog sniffed out this story and shared it with you.
The Article Was Written/Published By: Rebecca Falconer



! #Headlines, #Axios, #California, #Government, #Guns, #Newsfeed, #NRA, #politics, #syndicated, news

Friday, August 23, 2019

Chris Murphy: Trump isn’t giving up on background checks

190823-chris-murphy-getty-773.jpg

Sen. Chris Murphy isn’t giving up on the long-shot effort to pass expanded gun background checks. And, he says, neither is President Donald Trump.

Fresh off Thursday evening conversations with White House staffers and a recent call with the president himself, the Connecticut Democrat says it is still possible that Trump and Senate Republicans will act in the wake of several recent mass shootings. While Murphy puts the chances of movement at less than 50 percent and recognizes some may deem him naive, he said it’s his “obligation” to keep pushing.

“The president and the White House have been clear. That they are willing to support background checks legislation that might not today be popular in the Republican Party,” Murphy told reporters in Hartford, Conn., on Friday. “The president and the White House has made it clear that they are open to leading on this issue and trying to bring Republicans along with them.”

In their conversation on Aug. 11, Murphy said Trump “told me personally that he was indeed serious about moving forward together on what he called meaningful background checks legislation” and that he understood GOP senators would not back anything without Trump’s explicit support.

Murphy is seeking to dispel the idea that the president has already caved to the National Rifle Association in a conversation this week, which intersected with a change in the president’s rhetoric. Trump began emphasizing that strong background checks were already law and that confronting mental health was more important.

But on Wednesday, Trump said he had made no commitment to Wayne LaPierre, the NRA’s president, even as the acknowledged gun owners are worried about a “slippery slope” curtailing their guns rights. Murphy said it was important to distinguish between Trump being open to universal background checks, which few Republicans support, and expanding background checks, which is more popular.

“We are going to be doing background checks,” Trump told reporters. “We already have very strong background checks but we are going to be filling in some of the loopholes, as we call them, at the border.”

Those remarks seemed to give new life to Murphy’s effort, though rank-and-file Republicans are drifting away without clear direction from the GOP’s standard-bearer. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said on Tuesday the dynamic on expanding background checks hasn’t changed. And Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who is tight with the Trump administration, cast doubt on both expanded red flags laws and background checks.

“What’s being proposed is not going to solve the problem and not make us safer,” Daines told reporters on Friday. “I’ve heard a lot of feedback from back home in Montana and most Montanans don’t believe that gun control is the answer.”

Daines suggested taking a look at legislation that could prevent adults from buying guns if they have been convicted of felonies like threatening schools as juveniles.

What’s under discussion among Murphy, GOP senators like Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania and Susan Collins of Maine and the White House is fairly modest. They are discussing expanding background checks but not making them universal, as the Democratic House’s bill would do. And a so-called red flag proposal aimed at stopping dangerous people from possessing firearms would create a grant program for states to implement those programs rather than create a new federal law.

Murphy said that even though as a “hard-liner” on gun regulations and a “skeptic” on Trump’s commitment, he thought the conversation was worth having. He hoped discussions would continue over the next two weeks of recess to ensure the firearms debate doesn’t stall out entirely before the Senate comes back from recess.

The White House is supposed to release new gun proposals in the coming weeks. And Murphy said the only way to clinch a result is for the president himself to back an actual piece of legislation and stick with it.

“Get behind a specific proposal,” he advised Trump. “So long as he is talking vaguely about his support for background checks or [red flags], very few Republicans are going to get behind” it.

Article originally published on POLITICO Magazine

Source: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/23/chris-murphy-trump-guns-background-checks-1473457
Droolin’ Dog sniffed out this story and shared it with you.
The Article Was Written/Published By: Burgess Everett



! #Headlines, #Congress, #Guns, #NRA, #Political, #Politico, #politics, #Trending, #Trump, #Newsfeed, #syndicated, news

Sunday, August 18, 2019

Rival gun groups look to fill the NRA’s void

19816-nra-ap-773.jpg

As the National Rifle Association flounders, some upstart pro-gun groups see an opportunity to become the nation’s most influential gun rights organization.

The groups say they’re attracting new members and raking in donations. They’re hiring additional staff to work on grassroots advocacy and lobbying. One is going so far as to discuss at a conference in September how to fill the void left by the NRA, which has struggled to address internal squabbles and accusations of financial mismanagement.

“There are a lot of NRA members that don’t like the infighting, don’t like all the lawsuits, don’t like some of the spending that’s been talked about in the press,” said Alan Gottlieb, founder of the pro-gun Second Amendment Foundation. “A lot of them — they want to defend gun rights, they’re not going to stop defending gun rights, they’re just looking at other places to do it.”

Several of the organizations vying to unseat the NRA as the nation’s top gun advocate are considered more aggressive advocates of the Second Amendment and include the Gun Owners of America and the National Association for Gun Rights, as well as the more moderate Second Amendment Foundation. Their moves come as Congress and President Donald Trump are discussing new gun restrictions after mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton, as well as an upcoming presidential election for which turning out gun owners will be a top priority for Trump’s campaign.

“As an organization, we don’t use Gucci-loafered lobbyists in Washington, D.C. in $200,000 wardrobes to grease the palms of weak-kneed politicians to vote right,” said Dudley Brown, president of the National Association for Gun Rights, referencing the NRA chief executive’s purported lavish spending. “Instead, we activate our members to do that lobbying for us and for them. That’s the power in a grassroots lobby and NRA lost that a long time ago.”

The Second Amendment Foundation and its advocacy wing, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms have each seen donations increase 20 to 25 percent from April to July, compared with the same period in 2018, in part because of the controversies surrounding the NRA, said Gottlieb. He would not provide detailed accounting of the donations.

Similarly, Gun Owners of America, said it raised so much money in recent years that it could last five years without additional funds — but also wouldn’t provide detailed figures. The National Association for Gun Rights, meanwhile, said it spent more on pro-gun lobbying than the NRA in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook mass shooting in 2012. It boasts it has 4.5 million grassroots activists, a little less than the around 5 million members the NRA claims.

But overtaking the NRA won’t be easy. The group still outspends other gun rights organizations most years in lobbying. And one of its key assets is its ability to galvanize members to vote.

“There’s no doubt that an NRA that is somewhat distracted with internal issues is a less effective advocate,” said Chris Wilson, a veteran GOP pollster. “Various other groups are trying to step up, but it takes years to build the kinds of lists and member relationships that the NRA has. So no one else is going to be able to mobilize the kind of effort that the NRA normally would.”

Catherine Mortensen, an NRA spokesperson, said in a statement that “anyone who chooses to discount gun owners does so at their own peril. NRA members and Second Amendment supporters will be engaged with their elected officials in Washington.”

Competing gun rights groups, however, say the NRA’s decline in influence began recently. Among their grievances is the NRA’s signaling an openness to red flag laws, which allow authorities to take away guns from people who are a threat to themselves and others. (The NRA however has not endorsed any red flag laws at the state level, and it failed to defeat such laws in 17 states and D.C.)

19816-dudley-brown-ap-773.jpg

The decline “all began when the NRA came in with a weak response to Parkland,” said Michael Hammond, legislative counsel of Gun Owners of America, referencing the mass shooting at a Florida high school last year that left 17 people dead. “I think that the recent financial troubles people would forgive. But I don’t think they forgive what they view as a weakness on Second Amendment issues.”

Hammond added the group plans to meet with the White House this week to push back against expanding background checks.

On the other side, gun control groups also see an opportunity to take on the NRA. During the midterms, gun control groups outspent the NRA for the first time. Peter Ambler, executive director of Giffords, said the NRA’s void could help them dominate the conversation.

“Organizations like Giffords are going to benefit from the vacuum created by the NRA’s crack up as well and in other ways we’re going to be the primary beneficiaries,” Ambler said. “First of all, we’re going to occupy the political space in terms of influencing the political conversation around guns and second of all we’re going to organize a lot of gun owners.”

Despite the recent turmoil, the NRA’s lobbying continues to be a powerful influence. The NRA and the NRA Institute for Legislative Action spent about $5 million on lobbying in 2018, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Gun Owners of America, by contrast, spent $1.55 million in 2018, the National Association for Gun Rights spent $1.1 million and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms spent $284,863, according to lobbying records.

The NRA has also spent big on Senate races, with the hope of turning out voters who will support gun rights. NRA members, at least in the past, have shown that they are more politically active than non-NRA-member gun owners.

A Pew Research survey from 2017 found that Republican gun owners who are part of the NRA do think gun laws should be less strict compared with Republican gun owners who are nonmembers. NRA members are also much more politically active than gun owners who do not belong to the NRA. The survey found that 46 percent of gun owners in the NRA had reached out to a public official to talk about gun policy, compared with 15 percent of non-NRA-member gun owners.

But even if the NRA yields less influence in the 2020 election, GOP strategists and other gun rights groups say that contingent of voters will stay motivated.

“The NRA is obviously working through some issues, but I don’t think that means their members are any less committed to Second Amendment causes,” said Alex Conant, a former aide to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla), now a Republican strategist. “You can get rid of the organization but as long as there’s hundreds of millions of Americans who own firearms and support the Second Amendment, you’re going to have real political opposition to gun control legislation.”

Article originally published on POLITICO Magazine

Source: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/18/nra-gun-lobbyist-1466701
Droolin’ Dog sniffed out this story and shared it with you.
The Article Was Written/Published By: jarkin@politico.com (James Arkin)



! #Headlines, #Guns, #NRA, #Political, #Politico, #politics, #Trending, #Newsfeed, #syndicated, news

Monday, May 6, 2019

Is the NRA finally losing its power over America?

nra-power.jpg

Analysis: Confronted by alleged scandal and shifting public sentiment, gun rights group is fighting for relevance

Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/nra-lawsuit-trump-tax-status-parkland-oliver-north-letitia-james-wayne-lapierre-a8899091.html
Droolin’ Dog sniffed out this story and shared it with you.
The Article Was Written/Published By: Andrew Buncombe



! #Headlines, #Election2020, #Elections, #Guns, #NRA, #politics, #Trending, #Newsfeed, #syndicated, news

Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Trump attacks New York attorney general over 'illegal' NRA investigation

trump.jpg

The state is analysing the NRA’s tax-exempt status

Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-nra-new-york-letitia-james-investigation-twitter-guns-oliver-north-a8891606.html
Droolin’ Dog sniffed out this story and shared it with you.
The Article Was Written/Published By: Clark Mindock



! #Headlines, #Guns, #NewYork, #NRA, #politics, #Trending, #Trump, #TrumpLiesMatter, #Newsfeed, #syndicated, news

Sunday, April 28, 2019

New York Attorney General Launches Investigation Into the National Rifle Association

New York Attorney General Launches Investigation Into the National Rifle AssociationLucas Jackson/ReutersNew York Attorney General Letitia James has launched an investigation into the National Rifle Association after reports surfaced of financial improprieties within the organization. “The Office of New York State Attorney General Letitia James has launched an investigation related to the National Rifle Association (NRA). As part of this investigation, the Attorney General has issued subpoenas,” a spokesperson for the attorney general’s office told NPR. According to NPR, the group received a document preservation notice in connection with the AG’s investigation, and The New York Times reports that several businesses connected with the gun rights group also received subpoenas.The announcement comes just hours after and the pro-gun group’s president, Oliver North, announced that he has been ousted, and The Daily Beast exclusively reported that longtime NRA lawyer, Steve Hart, has been suspended. North’s ouster capped off days of vicious infighting within the organization, with chief executive Wayne LaPierre claiming earlier this week that North was trying to blackmail him into leaving. North was also at the center of a lawsuit filed by NRA lawyers against the group’s longtime ad agency, Ackerman McQueen, over promotional work that apparently failed to deliver. The lawsuit alleged that North double-dipped by taking a salary from both the NRA and Ackerman McQueen at the same time and failed to deliver on promised sponsorship deals, saying the group found “no evidence that any substantial sponsorships exist.” After news broke Saturday of the attorney general’s probe, an outside lawyer for the NRA said the group would cooperate. “The NRA will fully cooperate with any inquiry into its finances,” outside counsel William A. Brewer III said in a statement, adding that the NRA is “prepared for this and has full confidence in its accounting practices.” Read more at The Daily Beast.

Source: https://news.yahoo.com/york-attorney-general-launches-investigation-231624824.html
Droolin’ Dog sniffed out this story and shared it with you.
The Article Was Written/Published By:



! #Headlines, #Guns, #Investigation, #NRA, #politics, #Trending, #Newsfeed, #syndicated, news